08:31 am: Abu Dhabi Art 2009 part two
Where was I? OK, took a day to rest my feet and went back to the fair for more.
In the Emirates Palace lobby...

Yan Pei-Ming,
Mona Lisa's Funeral, 2008
There is another panel on the wall that you can't see. One of the men in bed is
the artist and one is his dead father. The landscape behind her is
filled with lots of skulls everywhere.
It's an interesting piece given how/why it was created--
for the Louvre. (Pei-Ming was to riff on a painting in their collection
because great artists riff on great art.)
Henry Loyrette, director of the Louvre, says of this commission:
The universality
of the Louvre is recalled here at this time of globalisation through the
strong link that is made between the museum's exceptional collections and
contemporary artistic creation. It emphasizes the power of a great work of
art to unite the people of all nations regardless of their differences. The
Louisvre thus reaffirms its position as an essential element in, and initiator
or, dialogue between cultures at the start of the 21st century.Wonder if this is what Pei-Ming was saying. :)

OK, here is an installation shot of Rachid Khimoune's
The Children of the World. Twenty-one bronze sculptures, each
flagging a national identity... US one on left with multiple NYC references (manhole covers) and the Great Plains warbonnet.
Khimoune
gave the children names, ie. Ayako the Japonese and Rania the Arab. http://www.artsawa.com/site/images/works/rk/aj.jpghttp://www.artsawa.com/site/images/works/rk/ra.jpgThere is a night shot of the side/back of the install in my last entry.
The rant about nationalism and essentialism and neo-imperialism and identity
is generally in this blog entry left as an exercise for the reader.
Oh well I'm ranting.
I don't take well to art as missionary work... and that seems to be how too many
western academically-trained arts professionals seem to imagine
what they doing here in the region. I do not think this is how
the works are appreciated and understood and collected by Gulf
nationals, and I think these attitudes could lead to some painful pushback.
My own position is getting a little complicated. I end up being nearly grateful
for
art world free-market attitudes, because that seems to be the only thing
able to loosen the deathgrip on art of the combination
of academy + big state money. A dealer who wants or needs to make money
will show works that are likely to sell.
Period.
Some collectors care a lot that artworks have academic imprimatur,
others prefer they don't, and most I suspect fall in the middle. Dealers, if they
are successful, know their people. They know what their people care about, what they
need, and what they want to see.
There are many gallery owners on the other hand who are in it for
the love of art, and they often do a hybrid schedule of stuff they <3 and stuff
their clients <3 and if it isn't the exact same work all the time, well, that is ok
and maybe you will never know. They take
a hit in the pocketbook for doing this but keep their soul.
Dealers don't worry about soul, having none, and life and selling
art is much therefore more simple. But they at least aren't trying to
enlighten anyone.
I just made up the distinction between
dealers and
gallery owners, it isn't
real or rather that distinction has no
currency. ;)
On the bright side are curators and writers with strong personal ties to the region,
very motivated and capable, who only put up with western cultural
imperialist nonsense as a tradeoff because it serves the development of
arts in the region. Otherwise they rebuke it
at every turn.
There is an enormous Guggenheim Museum under construction, and there is no
collection to fill it. It really matters right now what works individuals
choose to collect-- it will have a degree of impact not possible in
established institutions.
The pieces that key collectors bought the day before yesterday are
what their grandchildren and great-grandchildren and great grand children
will grow up knowing as "art."
Anyway. One thing a trip to a major art fair tells me
is how my own tastes, needs, and wants differ from those of
people who have six, seven, eight figures
(USD) to drop on artworks. We aren't quite really living on the same planet,
but at events like this we can sometimes see each other. :)
I get a glimpse into their world when I
look at myself in a shiny Koons. You can't really see a Koons
without looking at a reflection of yourself, all tinted and glossy
and distorted. It's awesome.
Of all the professionals I heard speak at Art Abu Dhabi, Larry Gagosian made
the most sense to me. Which leaves me going, wtf, did an alien give me a personality
transplant?
He was the one on a panel about collecting
that could deal well with the charge of elitism. He compared it to
poetry-- kids who go to school are generally exposed to poetry,
how many are still reading it 30 years later.
Well, I would guess that more do in the Gulf.
Poetry matters here, which is why it ends up in so many paintings (see below).
But he is basically running a museum out of his NYC gallery. He said 100,000 people
came through his
recent Picasso show, for free. He had tour buses of senior citizens
and kids on school field trips and they just kept coming.
Anyway, Gagosian feels he gives to the common people and gives plenty,
and so the charge of elitism really does not bother him. If you are open to
the public, you deal with everyone. If you work within the confines of museums
with paid entry charges and universities, that is another matter entirely. You
might never personally speak to someone who is poor.
OK, moving on to the booths. I tried to photograph the work that you might not get to
see much of if you weren't living in the Gulf, figuring American and European readers have
enough access already in person and online and in publications
to the Koons and Picasso and Haring and Bourgeois etc. etc.
But when I got home and researched, the artists I loved
were in general already showing in London and New York.
There was a contemporary Indian art exhibit
that was not part of the fair but in the palace. I mostly failed to photograph it
because the Sheika was visiting when I was there with my camera. I went back
and the staff made me feel uncomfortable, sad to say, and I did not linger.
My photos are heavy on painting because that's what I look at most,
but so was the fair.

Golnaz Fathi,
untitled 3, acrylic, 170 x 140cm
Above is a horrible photo of a gorgeous Golnaz Fathi piece. Go
here and read this about her
and her work. Note the relationship to text/poetry, Parker does a wonderful job explaining
so I don't have to try.

This was the back wall of Bait Musna gallery from Oman. It feels to me to be the kind of art
most specific to the Arabic pennisula region. Since prices were posted
on the wall in dirhams and US dollars, I will include them.
top left: Abdallah Akar
Les Astres poetry M. Darwich mixed media on canvas 80 x 100cm $11670
bottom left: Moosa Omar
Myths buried in the silence mixed media on board, 120 x 40cm $4000
right: Abdallah Akar
Le Talisman poetry I. Abou Mahdi mixed media on canvas 80 x 100cm $20,000

This is by Khaled Hafez... an Egyptian artist, just at Queens Museum in Brooklyn+
a Saatchi artist so some of you have had a chance to see him before.
More
here.Interview here with his art world analysis-- very worthwhile!

Reza Derakshani, detail of
white falcon hunting green 180x450cm
Iranian painter... now that I research him, I find out
he also did my
least favorite art in the fair. That is something,
out of all that art. He's got the goods.
Here is a link to the work
I didn't like. It is not because I thought it was bad, but because
I really didn't like how it made me feel and
I was frustrated to see yet more tragic
veiled woman imagery. This is the exact piece that bothered me. You can't see how scarred and pitted
the surface was from the photo, but ugh, acid burns. What do you know, he has
also done work on the theme of
the circus.
Abdul Qadir Al Rais,
Caligraphy watercolor 203 x 152cm
Emirati painter. This photo is not kind to his luminous color
and Google is not being kind to me at the moment in terms of links--
I believe this is an older artist and may not be on the internet.
I've seen other works by this artist with the the glowing watercolors,
use of calligraphy and masking.
Sometimes I feel
excluded by the use of calligraphy--I don't read Arabic or Farsi. It's not a bad
thing necessarily when this happens, not all art is meant for ME ME ME. But this artists' work
does not rub me that way, ever. The color is so exuberant and the calligraphy tends
to be large, looping and embracing.
I still have more photos but I'm getting tired. I went back to the art fair for a
third time and even made myself take a few photos not of paintings. But enough for today.